Difference between revisions of "ANYL Award"

From Jimenez Group Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m
(Best Papers of 2023)
 
(20 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
= Past Winners of the Awards =
 
= Past Winners of the Awards =
 +
==Best Papers of 2023 ==
 +
[[File:2023 winners landscape.jpg|350px|thumb]]
 +
* <b>Graduate Student:</b> Lindsey Anderson, for Analyzing the Impact of Evolving Combustion Conditions on the Composition of Wildfire Emissions Using Satellite Data, <i>Geophys. Res. Lett.</i>, 50, e2023GL105811, 2023.
 +
* <b>Res Sci:</b> Raina Gough, for Laboratory Studies of Brine Growth Kinetics Relevant to Deliquescence on Mars. <i>Planet. Sci. J.</i> 4:46 2023
 +
<br>
 +
<br>
 +
<br>
 +
 +
==Best Papers of 2022 ==
 +
[[File:2023_Doug.jpg|175px|thumb]]
 +
* <b>Graduate Student:</b> Henning Finkenzeller, for [https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-022-01067-z The gas-phase source mechanism of iodic acid as an atmospheric aerosol source], H. Finkenzeller, S. Iyer, X-C. He, M. Simon, T.K. Koenig, C.F. Lee, R. Valiev, V. Hofbauer, A. Amorim, R. Baalbaki, A. Baccarini, L. Beck, D.M. Bell, L. Caudillo, D. Chen, R. Chiu, B. Chu, L. Dada, J. Duplissy, M. Heinritzi, D. Kemppainen, C. Kim, J. Krechmer, A. Kuerten, A. Kvashnin, H. Lamkaddam, C. Ping Lee, K. Lehtipalo, Z. Li, V. Makhmutov, H.E. Manninen, G. Marie, R. Marten, R.L. Mauldin, B. Mentler, T. Mueller, T. Petäjä, M. Philippov, A. Ranjithkumar, B. Roerup, J. Shen, D. Stolzenburg, C. Tauber, Y.J. Tham, A. Tom´e, M. Vazquez-Pufleau, A.C. Wagner, D.S. Wang, M. Wang, Y. Wang, S.K. Weber, W. Nie, Y. Wu, M. Xiao, Q. Ye, M. Zauner-Wieczorek, A. Hansel, U. Baltensperger, J. Brioude, J. Curtius, N.M. Donahue, I. El Haddad, R.C. Flagan, M. Kulmala, J. Kirkby, M. Sipil¨a, D.R. Worsnop, T. Kurten, M. Rissanen, R. Volkamer. Nature Chemistry, 15, 129–135. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-022-01067-z, 2023 (in press 2022).
 +
 +
* <b>Res Sci:</b> Doug Day, for [https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-459-2022 A systematic re-evaluation of methods for quantification of bulk particle-phase organic nitrates using real-time aerosol mass spectrometry]. D.A. Day, P. Campuzano-Jost, B.A. Nault, B.B. Palm, W. Hu, H. Guo, P.J. Wooldridge, R.C. Cohen, K.S. Docherty, J.A. Huffman, S.S. de Sá, S.T. Martin, J.L. Jimenez.  Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 459–483, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-459-2022, 2022.
 +
 +
== Best Papers of 2021 ==
 +
[[File:2022_Mindy.jpg|175px|thumb]]
 +
* <b>Graduate Student:</b> Mindy Schueneman, for [https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-2237-2021 Aerosol pH indicator and organosulfate detectability from aerosol mass spectrometry measurements]. M.K. Schueneman, B.A. Nault, P. Campuzano-Jost, D.S. Jo, D.A. Day, J.C. Schroder, B.B. Palm, A. Hodzic, J.E. Dibb, J.L. Jimenez. Atmos. Meas. Tech., 4, 2237–2260, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-2237-2021, 2021.
 +
 +
* <b>Postdoc:</b> Derek Price, for [https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.1c00229 Sources of Gas-Phase Species in an Art Museum from Comprehensive Real-Time Measurements]. D.J. Price, D.A. Day, D. Pagonis, H. Stark, A.V. Handschy, L.B. Algrim, S.L. Miller, J.A. de Gouw, P.J. Ziemann, J.L. Jimenez. ACS Earth Space Chem., 5, 9, 2252–2267, https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.1c00229, 2021.
 +
 +
[[File:2022_Derek.jpg|175px|thumb]]
 +
 +
== Best Papers of 2020 ==
 +
 +
* <b>Graduate Student:</b> Mitchell Alton, for [https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.0c01368 Atmospheric Chemistry of Volatile Methyl Siloxanes: Kinetics andProducts of Oxidation by OH Radicals and Cl Atoms]. M.W. Alton, E.C. Browne, Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 54, 10, 5992–5999. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c01368
 +
 +
* <b>Postdoc:</b> Zhe Peng, for [https://doi.org/10.1039/C9CS00766K Radical chemistry in oxidation flow reactors for atmospheric chemistry research]. Z. Peng, J.L. Jimenez, Chem. Soc. Rev., 49, 2570 - 2616, 2020. doi: 10.1039/C9CS00766K
 +
 
== Best Papers of 2019 ==
 
== Best Papers of 2019 ==
 
[[File:20201012_Ted_sm.png|175px|thumb]]
 
[[File:20201012_Ted_sm.png|175px|thumb]]
Line 54: Line 82:
  
 
== Detailed Rules for Faculty Voting (for both competitions) ==
 
== Detailed Rules for Faculty Voting (for both competitions) ==
* (1) Each faculty votes per the rules. As is standard to avoid conflicts-of-interest, faculty cannot vote on papers where they are coauthors.  If an advisor does not vote, the papers from his/her advisees will not be eligible for the Award.  
+
* (1) Each faculty votes per the rules, by ranking the papers in a category as 1st (best), 2nd etc. As is standard to avoid conflicts-of-interest, faculty cannot vote on papers where they are coauthors.  If an advisor does not vote, the papers from his/her advisees will not be eligible for the Award.  
 
* (2) The final score is calculated by summing the individual faculty scores for a paper, and then dividing by the number of faculty that voted on that paper. E.g. if a paper is ranked 1st by one faculty member and 2nd by another (and only those 2 faculty voted), it has 3 total points, and a final score of 3 / 2 = 1.5.
 
* (2) The final score is calculated by summing the individual faculty scores for a paper, and then dividing by the number of faculty that voted on that paper. E.g. if a paper is ranked 1st by one faculty member and 2nd by another (and only those 2 faculty voted), it has 3 total points, and a final score of 3 / 2 = 1.5.
 
* (3) The paper with the lowest final score wins.
 
* (3) The paper with the lowest final score wins.
 
* (4) If one or more papers are within 10.0% of the score of the winning paper (calculated as (2nd - winner) / winner), then those papers also win. Otherwise there is only one winner.
 
* (4) If one or more papers are within 10.0% of the score of the winning paper (calculated as (2nd - winner) / winner), then those papers also win. Otherwise there is only one winner.

Latest revision as of 13:40, 19 September 2024

Past Winners of the Awards

Best Papers of 2023

2023 winners landscape.jpg
  • Graduate Student: Lindsey Anderson, for Analyzing the Impact of Evolving Combustion Conditions on the Composition of Wildfire Emissions Using Satellite Data, Geophys. Res. Lett., 50, e2023GL105811, 2023.
  • Res Sci: Raina Gough, for Laboratory Studies of Brine Growth Kinetics Relevant to Deliquescence on Mars. Planet. Sci. J. 4:46 2023




Best Papers of 2022

2023 Doug.jpg
  • Graduate Student: Henning Finkenzeller, for The gas-phase source mechanism of iodic acid as an atmospheric aerosol source, H. Finkenzeller, S. Iyer, X-C. He, M. Simon, T.K. Koenig, C.F. Lee, R. Valiev, V. Hofbauer, A. Amorim, R. Baalbaki, A. Baccarini, L. Beck, D.M. Bell, L. Caudillo, D. Chen, R. Chiu, B. Chu, L. Dada, J. Duplissy, M. Heinritzi, D. Kemppainen, C. Kim, J. Krechmer, A. Kuerten, A. Kvashnin, H. Lamkaddam, C. Ping Lee, K. Lehtipalo, Z. Li, V. Makhmutov, H.E. Manninen, G. Marie, R. Marten, R.L. Mauldin, B. Mentler, T. Mueller, T. Petäjä, M. Philippov, A. Ranjithkumar, B. Roerup, J. Shen, D. Stolzenburg, C. Tauber, Y.J. Tham, A. Tom´e, M. Vazquez-Pufleau, A.C. Wagner, D.S. Wang, M. Wang, Y. Wang, S.K. Weber, W. Nie, Y. Wu, M. Xiao, Q. Ye, M. Zauner-Wieczorek, A. Hansel, U. Baltensperger, J. Brioude, J. Curtius, N.M. Donahue, I. El Haddad, R.C. Flagan, M. Kulmala, J. Kirkby, M. Sipil¨a, D.R. Worsnop, T. Kurten, M. Rissanen, R. Volkamer. Nature Chemistry, 15, 129–135. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-022-01067-z, 2023 (in press 2022).

Best Papers of 2021

2022 Mindy.jpg
2022 Derek.jpg

Best Papers of 2020

Best Papers of 2019

20201012 Ted sm.png
  • Graduate Student: Theodore Koenig, for Quantitative detection of iodine in the stratosphere. Koenig, T.K., Baidar S., Campuzano-Jost, P., Cuevas, C.A., Dix, B., Fernandez, R.P., Guo, H., Hall, S.R., Kinnison, D., Nault, B.A., Ullmann, K., Jimenez, J.L., Saiz-Lopez, A. and Volkamer R.: Quantitative Detection of Iodine in the Stratosphere, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., doi: 10.1073/pnas.1916828117, 2020. (in press 2019)
2018 Ben JennyPaper2.jpg

Best Papers of 2018

2018 Ben BestPaper2.jpg
2017 Natalie BestPaper.jpg

Best Papers of 2017

Best Paper of 2016

2016 Jordan BestPaper.jpg

Best Paper of 2015

Best Paper of 2014 (shared 3-ways)

CIRES Env. Chem. Division Best Student Paper Award

Rules for the Competition

  • (1) The paper must have been published in final form and/or have an official acceptance date during the past calendar year. Non-peer reviewed papers are not eligible, including “discussions” papers. A given paper can only be submitted for the Award once, even if it is eligible in two consecutive years.
  • (2) The first author of the paper must be (have been) a PhD or Masters student in one of the groups under CIRES Environmental Chemistry when the paper was submitted. This includes CIRES/ANYL students working for faculty in other divisions, departments or in national labs. It also includes students who have graduated, as long as the paper was part of their graduate research and was published during the past calendar year. A given student can only win this competition once.
  • (3) The first author of the paper should submit the following materials to the ANYL Graduate Advisor via email:
    • PDF of the paper in final form
    • A paragraph (limited to 250 words) stating the significance and impact of the work and their role in the work described in the paper
  • (4) The criteria for the Award will include the novelty and importance of the results, the quality of the presentation, and the quality of the journal.
  • (5) The CIRES EnvChem faculty will vote to choose one paper. Details below.
  • (6) The Award will be presented at ANYL seminar, and will consist of $500 and a Certificate

CHEM ANYL Division Best Postdoc & Research Scientist Paper Award

Rules for the Competition

  • All rules are the same as for the graduate student award, with the following exceptions:
  • (2) The first author of the paper must be (have been) a postdoctoral researcher or research scientist in the CHEM ANYL Division when the paper was submitted. This includes people who have moved on from CU, as long as the paper was part of their research at CU, and was published during the past calendar year. A given person can only win this competition once.
  • (5) The CHEM ANYL faculty will vote to choose one paper. Details below.

Detailed Rules for Faculty Voting (for both competitions)

  • (1) Each faculty votes per the rules, by ranking the papers in a category as 1st (best), 2nd etc. As is standard to avoid conflicts-of-interest, faculty cannot vote on papers where they are coauthors. If an advisor does not vote, the papers from his/her advisees will not be eligible for the Award.
  • (2) The final score is calculated by summing the individual faculty scores for a paper, and then dividing by the number of faculty that voted on that paper. E.g. if a paper is ranked 1st by one faculty member and 2nd by another (and only those 2 faculty voted), it has 3 total points, and a final score of 3 / 2 = 1.5.
  • (3) The paper with the lowest final score wins.
  • (4) If one or more papers are within 10.0% of the score of the winning paper (calculated as (2nd - winner) / winner), then those papers also win. Otherwise there is only one winner.