Difference between revisions of "CO-CIMS"
From Jimenez Group Wiki
m |
(→1st Mtg: February 2017) |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
* This meeting took place at CU on 15 Feb 2017. | * This meeting took place at CU on 15 Feb 2017. | ||
* [https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/10PdjZgCmrH6kI9Oj1kgYsGJHDa2SAgxRYEE6SKTKX64/edit#gid=52735421 The schedule is here] | * [https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/10PdjZgCmrH6kI9Oj1kgYsGJHDa2SAgxRYEE6SKTKX64/edit#gid=52735421 The schedule is here] | ||
− | |||
<!-- [https://cires1.colorado.edu/jimenez-group/CIMeetings/Boulder2017/test.txt Link to presentations]--> | <!-- [https://cires1.colorado.edu/jimenez-group/CIMeetings/Boulder2017/test.txt Link to presentations]--> | ||
Revision as of 12:52, 16 February 2017
This page documents the Colorado Front Range ToF-CIMS & Related Techniques Users Meetings, started in Feb. 2017.
Next Meetings
- Tentatively we are planning on 1/2 day meetings twice a year. Thus the next meetings will take place in June or July 2017 and on Feb. 2018. This may change depending on the interests of the participants.
1st Mtg: February 2017
- This meeting took place at CU on 15 Feb 2017.
- The schedule is here
- Introduction
- High-Resolution Peak Fitting Issues
- Andy Neuman: Reasons for embracing negative peaks. I'll show examples of bias introduced by not allowing negative peaks, and discuss how to best measure compounds with mixing ratios that often approach zero
- Ryan Fulgham: Harald's tools for peak fitting by functional group (no presentation)
- Harald Stark: Data analysis Q&A (no presentation)
- Background signals and related topics
- Matt Coggon: Post-Tofware Data Processing - Background Correction Procedures
- Demetrios Pagonis: Tubing delay analysis
- Ellie Browne: discussion on reducing backgrounds (no presentation)
- Calibrations
- Jordan Krechmer: CIMS calibration: transmission curve and voltage scanning
- Bin Yuan: Liquid Calibration Unit (LCU)
- Ion Chemistry, IMR and related topics
- Andy Neuman: Possible matrix effects with iodide ion chemistry. I'll show how the response to calibrations can depend on the background air composition.
- Michael Link: How competitive are the rates of thermally enhanced processes and wall to gas partitioning with particle to gas partitioning using the "Aerosol CIMS" measurement technique?
- Patrick Veres: IMR redesign tests and results
- Applications
- Carsten Warneke: Intercomparison of I-CIMS and H3O+CIMS during FIREX Firelab
- Harald Stark: Ambient amine measurements using protonated ethanol CIMS
- KANAKO SEKIMOTO: PMF analysis of Firelab data
- Aroob Abdelhamid + Jennifer Berry: Applications of the APi-ToF
- Patrick Veres: HCl and ClNO2 observations in Boulder via TOF CIMS and Picarro CRD