Difference between revisions of "HR Ion List"

From Jimenez Group Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
Remaining issues:
 
Remaining issues:
 +
 
1. substracting electron mass.
 
1. substracting electron mass.
  
 
One electron mass should be substracted for all the ions and two electron masses should be stubstracted for doubly-charged ions. Since all the other interfaces, such as the m/z calibration table, do not substract electron masses. The ion lists we are working now (both default and master lists) have not treated by the electron masses yet.
 
One electron mass should be substracted for all the ions and two electron masses should be stubstracted for doubly-charged ions. Since all the other interfaces, such as the m/z calibration table, do not substract electron masses. The ion lists we are working now (both default and master lists) have not treated by the electron masses yet.

Latest revision as of 12:59, 1 November 2009

The purpose of this page is to serve as a history of the high-resolution ion list used within the PIKA analysis program for HR-ToF-AMS data.

As of June 2009, and as decided at the first HR-AMS Data Analysis Clinic in Boulder, Puneet Chhabra (Caltech), Niall Robinson (Manchester), Qi Chen (Harvard), and Delphine Farmer (Colorado) will serve as curators of the ion list.

Remaining issues:

1. substracting electron mass.

One electron mass should be substracted for all the ions and two electron masses should be stubstracted for doubly-charged ions. Since all the other interfaces, such as the m/z calibration table, do not substract electron masses. The ion lists we are working now (both default and master lists) have not treated by the electron masses yet.