), and
using
Fisher statistics. As described in the Statistics section, directions
and statistics obtained with approximations produce a beep (up to 4 beeps for a
Least Squares Equal Area plot and 6 for the Locality Equal Area plot). The
Plot Error Ellipse option becomes active once the Fisher Stats option is
selected; when checked, the
cone of confidence is plotted. The
"Hemisphere" option is identical to the "Fisher Stats" above except that points
in opposite hemispheres are inverted; this produces a Fisher mean of reversed
and normal polarities inverted through the origin so that they can be combined.
More details are in the Statistics section. When the "Elliptical statistics"
option is selected, either the Bingham or the Non-Parametric Statistic can be
used; one or the other will be checked. Bingham uses Bingham
statistics. Note that this uses a lookup table and approximations for the
construction of the
estimates that are probably unreliable for data
distributed in a girdle (plane data). "Non-Parametric Stats" uses
non-parametric statistics suggested by Watson as presented in Fisher et al.
(1987) (thus the label "Watson" when the statistic is displayed). This
statistic becomes more accurate with larger numbers of directions; the
uncertainty ellipses are probably unreliable with under about 20 samples.
"Plot Girdle" plots the girdle to the confidence ellipse (the ellipse plus and
minus 90°ree;). This might be desired if you had a group of plane or circle
fits that all clustered near each other and you wished to plot the region where
the two magnetization components would lie.

One of the three options below is always checked when the "Elliptical stats" option is active:

For example, the dialog above indicates that the test was performed on tilt-corrected directions, that these directions pass a common distribution test. (The calculated F of the F test exceeds F0.80; thus the null hypothesis would only be rejected at the 20% confidence level). The means differ by 12.7°ree;, much less than the 26.1°ree; critical angle, indicating that the data pass the reversal test at the 95% confidence limit. But the high value of the critical angle places this in the "indeterminate" classification of McFadden and McElhinny (1990a). The null hypothesis of a common mean would be rejected at or below the 53% confidence level.
Note that this code is not derived from the code that McFadden and McElhinny offer in their paper but was written from the algorithm described in the paper. Also, tests of the bootstrap code on data with identical concentration parameters yielded higher critical angles than those derived from the analytic equation for populations with a common concentration parameter. Thus the bootstrap test might pass data that should fail. The only test suggested by McFadden and McElhinny (1990a) not implemented here is the test for a single direction comprising one of the two groups.
1755 visits from Tue, Apr 21 1998 17:07 to Apr/ 6/02 21:09